Close Menu
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
  • Home
  • Guns
  • Knives
  • Gear
  • News
  • Videos
  • Community

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tactical, firearms and many more news and updates directly to your inbox.

What's Hot

US Army Awards Contract to Modernize Ammunition Management

Sep 24, 2026 8:39 pm

If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Fulcrum: Quirky CRKT Folder Returns

Sep 24, 2026 4:32 pm

Mystery Ranch Expands Offering with Black

Sep 24, 2026 4:29 pm
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Friday, September 25, 2026 3:24 am EDT
Trending
  • US Army Awards Contract to Modernize Ammunition Management
  • If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Fulcrum: Quirky CRKT Folder Returns
  • Mystery Ranch Expands Offering with Black
  • DroneShield Opens Adelaide R&D Hub to Accelerate Next-Generation of Australian Defence Technology
  • Knife Rights NJ Lawsuit is Garnering Attention
  • AKTI: Dates Announced for 2026 Free To Carry Auction
  • Rock’a Lock’a BANG! BANG! — Day One / Night One Report
  • Ayoob: Should You Always Get Off the X?
  • Privacy
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
  • Home
  • Guns
  • Knives
  • Gear
  • News
  • Videos
  • Community
Newsletter
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
Home » Gun Rights Group Fights NY Body Armor Ban in Court
News

Gun Rights Group Fights NY Body Armor Ban in Court

Jack BogartBy Jack BogartApr 2, 2026 8:06 pm18 ViewsNo Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp
Gun Rights Group Fights NY Body Armor Ban in Court
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

A major gun-rights organization wants the New York law banning civilian purchase of body armor declared unconstitutional and tossed into the dustbin of history.

On March 27, the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed a motion for summary judgment with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York in the case Heeter v. James. At issue is a New York state law that unconstitutionally criminalizes the purchase of simple personal protective equipment and shows just how far off the deep end the state is willing to go to prevent peaceable people from protecting themselves.

The motion states: “The Ban prohibits the purchase, acquisition, or sale of any ‘protective body covering intended to protect against gunfire,’ by anyone who is not a member of several ‘eligible professions.’ The Ban violates the Second Amendment-protected rights of all law-abiding New Yorkers with ordinary self-defense needs who desire body armor, including the individual Plaintiffs, and other similarly situated members of Plaintiff Firearms Policy Coalition.”

The motion further argues that New York’s defense of the law doesn’t live up to the criteria set by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Bruen ruling.

“New York simply cannot show that body armor is both dangerous and unusual, nor ‘unusually dangerous,’” the brief argues. “First, body armor is not dangerous, serving only defensive purposes. Second, because body armor is in common use for self-defense, it is not unusual, and no historical evidence the State could put forward could possibly justify the Ban. Indeed, New York is the first state to ban body armor for law-abiding citizens. The Body Armor Ban is a novel outlier that emerged more than 200 years after the Founding. There is no mainstream tradition from which Defendants could attempt to piece together potential analogs.”

Indeed, as the brief further notes, body armor is widely used in many other states.

“Body armor is legal in all states other than New York, creating a robust market for civilian body armor,” the brief states. “There are at least 70 manufacturers that sell body armor to the civilian marketplace, demonstrating strong consumer demand.

“A recent analysis of the body armor market by Precedence Research (“Precedence”) concluded that American civilians spent $41.9 million on body armor in 2022. Precedence projected that U.S. civilian expenditures on body armor would increase to $69.2 million by 2034, as the materials to make body armor become more and more lightweight, thereby increasing its popularity.”

In a news release announcing the court filing, FPC President Brandon Combs said his organization is “thrilled” to have filed the motion to strike down the “immoral” body armor ban.

“The government can’t ban peaceable people from buying defensive gear any more than it can ban them from buying handguns,” Combs said. “We’re going to make New York stop treating self-defense like a crime, full stop.”

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

The Army’s new drone-first soldiers are already graduating from training school

ATF’s New Records Rule Sparks Gun Registry Debate

Compact vs Full-Size Suppressors: Which Is Better?

SIG ZULU6 HDX 16×42 Review

Bear Creek Arsenal BC-15 Pistol in .338 ARC

Olight’s Updated ArkPro Ultra EDC Flashlight

ATF Director Addresses Brace Rule and Reform

Why Flintlock Muskets Aren’t Regulated Like AR-15s

Minneapolis Gun Ordinance Likely Violates State Law

Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Fulcrum: Quirky CRKT Folder Returns

Sep 24, 2026 4:32 pm

Mystery Ranch Expands Offering with Black

Sep 24, 2026 4:29 pm

DroneShield Opens Adelaide R&D Hub to Accelerate Next-Generation of Australian Defence Technology

Sep 24, 2026 3:28 pm

Knife Rights NJ Lawsuit is Garnering Attention

Sep 24, 2026 1:30 pm

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tactical, firearms and many more news and updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

AKTI: Dates Announced for 2026 Free To Carry Auction

By Jack Bogart

Rock’a Lock’a BANG! BANG! — Day One / Night One Report

By Jack Bogart

Ayoob: Should You Always Get Off the X?

By Jack Bogart
Tactical Americans
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © 2026 Tactical Americans. Created by Sawah Solutions.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.