Close Menu
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
  • Home
  • Guns
  • Knives
  • Gear
  • News
  • Videos
  • Community

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tactical, firearms and many more news and updates directly to your inbox.

What's Hot

Rare Bipartisan Effort Pushes to Expand Wildlife Corridors Crossing Deadly Highways

May 5, 2026 5:11 pm

AEVEX Joins Persistent Systems’ Wave Relay Ecosystem

May 5, 2026 4:15 pm

Interior Pushes to Streamline Hunting Rules on Parks, Federal Sites

May 5, 2026 4:10 pm
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Tuesday, May 5, 2026 5:33 pm EDT
Trending
  • Rare Bipartisan Effort Pushes to Expand Wildlife Corridors Crossing Deadly Highways
  • AEVEX Joins Persistent Systems’ Wave Relay Ecosystem
  • Interior Pushes to Streamline Hunting Rules on Parks, Federal Sites
  • Bear Attacks Hikers in Yellowstone National Park
  • DroneShield and Terma Sign Strategic MOU to Advance Layered Counter-UAS Capabilities
  • The Best Hiking Pants for Men of 2026
  • Mountain Hardwear Alakazam 45L Backpack Review
  • Buck of the Month for May is a Retro Tribute to Star Wars
  • Privacy
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
  • Home
  • Guns
  • Knives
  • Gear
  • News
  • Videos
  • Community
Newsletter
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
Home » Gun Rights Group Fights NY Body Armor Ban in Court
News

Gun Rights Group Fights NY Body Armor Ban in Court

Jack BogartBy Jack BogartApr 2, 2026 8:06 pm4 ViewsNo Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp
Gun Rights Group Fights NY Body Armor Ban in Court
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

A major gun-rights organization wants the New York law banning civilian purchase of body armor declared unconstitutional and tossed into the dustbin of history.

On March 27, the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed a motion for summary judgment with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York in the case Heeter v. James. At issue is a New York state law that unconstitutionally criminalizes the purchase of simple personal protective equipment and shows just how far off the deep end the state is willing to go to prevent peaceable people from protecting themselves.

The motion states: “The Ban prohibits the purchase, acquisition, or sale of any ‘protective body covering intended to protect against gunfire,’ by anyone who is not a member of several ‘eligible professions.’ The Ban violates the Second Amendment-protected rights of all law-abiding New Yorkers with ordinary self-defense needs who desire body armor, including the individual Plaintiffs, and other similarly situated members of Plaintiff Firearms Policy Coalition.”

The motion further argues that New York’s defense of the law doesn’t live up to the criteria set by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Bruen ruling.

“New York simply cannot show that body armor is both dangerous and unusual, nor ‘unusually dangerous,’” the brief argues. “First, body armor is not dangerous, serving only defensive purposes. Second, because body armor is in common use for self-defense, it is not unusual, and no historical evidence the State could put forward could possibly justify the Ban. Indeed, New York is the first state to ban body armor for law-abiding citizens. The Body Armor Ban is a novel outlier that emerged more than 200 years after the Founding. There is no mainstream tradition from which Defendants could attempt to piece together potential analogs.”

Indeed, as the brief further notes, body armor is widely used in many other states.

“Body armor is legal in all states other than New York, creating a robust market for civilian body armor,” the brief states. “There are at least 70 manufacturers that sell body armor to the civilian marketplace, demonstrating strong consumer demand.

“A recent analysis of the body armor market by Precedence Research (“Precedence”) concluded that American civilians spent $41.9 million on body armor in 2022. Precedence projected that U.S. civilian expenditures on body armor would increase to $69.2 million by 2034, as the materials to make body armor become more and more lightweight, thereby increasing its popularity.”

In a news release announcing the court filing, FPC President Brandon Combs said his organization is “thrilled” to have filed the motion to strike down the “immoral” body armor ban.

“The government can’t ban peaceable people from buying defensive gear any more than it can ban them from buying handguns,” Combs said. “We’re going to make New York stop treating self-defense like a crime, full stop.”

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Frame & Receiver Fight Isn’t Slowing Down

NY Post Calls Basic Guns a “Deadly Arsenal”

Barnes 6mm ARC Ammo Review: 1,000-Yard Test

1,000 Rounds Later: 10-8 Master Class Review

Is Aero Precision Going Out of Business?

Suppressors Are Now “Common Use”—Here’s Why

Griffin GHS Red Dot Review: Built Like a Tank

Pro-Gun Advocates Push Back on Carry Bill

Can a $400 1911 Actually Be Worth It?

Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

AEVEX Joins Persistent Systems’ Wave Relay Ecosystem

May 5, 2026 4:15 pm

Interior Pushes to Streamline Hunting Rules on Parks, Federal Sites

May 5, 2026 4:10 pm

Bear Attacks Hikers in Yellowstone National Park

May 5, 2026 3:09 pm

DroneShield and Terma Sign Strategic MOU to Advance Layered Counter-UAS Capabilities

May 5, 2026 2:13 pm

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tactical, firearms and many more news and updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

The Best Hiking Pants for Men of 2026

By news

Mountain Hardwear Alakazam 45L Backpack Review

By news

Buck of the Month for May is a Retro Tribute to Star Wars

By news
Tactical Americans
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © 2026 Tactical Americans. Created by Sawah Solutions.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.