Close Menu
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
  • Home
  • Guns
  • Knives
  • Gear
  • News
  • Videos
  • Community

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tactical, firearms and many more news and updates directly to your inbox.

What's Hot

NSA, DEVCOM Army Research Office Launch QuantumEAGLe Initiative

Jul 4, 2026 8:25 pm

From the Archives: Ethan Becker on Independence Day

Jul 4, 2026 1:21 pm

Staccato 2011 Introduces the All-New Staccato HD P4X

Jul 4, 2026 12:15 pm
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Saturday, July 4, 2026 9:12 pm EDT
Trending
  • NSA, DEVCOM Army Research Office Launch QuantumEAGLe Initiative
  • From the Archives: Ethan Becker on Independence Day
  • Staccato 2011 Introduces the All-New Staccato HD P4X
  • M8 Howitzer Motor Carriage: Artillery on a Stuart Chassis
  • Party Like It’s 1776
  • Silent Professionals Set the Conditions for Red Flag Success
  • Freedom Atlantic Introduces FPV Training Drones
  • SOFWERX – Warfighter Radio Industry Day
  • Privacy
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
  • Home
  • Guns
  • Knives
  • Gear
  • News
  • Videos
  • Community
Newsletter
Tactical AmericansTactical Americans
Home » South Dakota Moves to Protect Suppressors Post-NFA
News

South Dakota Moves to Protect Suppressors Post-NFA

Jack BogartBy Jack BogartFeb 13, 2026 10:03 am3 ViewsNo Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp
South Dakota Moves to Protect Suppressors Post-NFA
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

One thing many American gun owners do not realize is that several states have laws stating that suppressors are legal to use in those states as long as they are registered under the federal National Firearms Act (NFA).

That is a positive thing, of course. However, it could leave those states in a dilemma. If and when the NFA is fully repealed, suppressor ownership and use in those states would no longer be legal until state laws are changed.

That’s the idea behind South Dakota’s Senate Bill 2, signed into law on February 10 by Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden. In a nutshell, the new law removed suppressors from the state’s definition of a “controlled weapon” and eliminated the statutory requirement that possession of these devices requires a federal tax stamp.

“South Dakota is the most Second Amendment-friendly state in America, and this is yet another opportunity for us to pave the way and set an example for the rest of the nation,” Gov. Rhoden said in a press release distributed after he signed the measure. “By removing unnecessary state-level restrictions, we are standing up for freedom and protecting the constitutional right of law-abiding citizens.”

Gov. Rhoden signed the bill, which was unanimously approved in both houses of the state legislature, at Silencer Central in Sioux Falls. That tax requirement, which was reduced to a $0 fee under President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill last year, must still be obtained as required by the NFA. The new South Dakota law fixes that requirement to ensure citizens can continue to obtain and possess suppressors should Congress pass the Hearing Protection Act to remove the duplicitous background check, registration and tax stamp requirement for these safety devices.

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the firearms industry trade association, worked with the South Dakota legislature to pass the bill and was quick to praise Gov. Rhoden for signing the measure.

“This is what proactive and commonsense leadership looks like. South Dakota is taking the steps to ensure that its citizens can lawfully obtain, possess and use a hearing protection device should we ever get to a point that they are removed from the National Firearms Act (NFA),” Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF senior vice president and general counsel, said in a news release announcing the victory. “Suppressors are hearing safety devices that make recreational shooting and hunting a safer and more enjoyable activity. We will continue to press to have these devices removed from the NFA so that they are more accessible to the public.”

State Rep. Drew Peterson, the primary sponsor of the measure in the House, said that since suppressors are mainly used for hearing protection, he was proud to support the legislation.

“Firearms Suppressor’s primary purpose is to protect hearing and reduce noise, which makes firearm use safer for hunters, sportsmen, and neighboring landowners alike,” he said. “Senate Bill 2 is a clean, common-sense update. It reduces redundancy, respects federal oversight, and keeps our laws aligned with the actual purpose of suppressors as safety tools.”

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

ATF’s New Records Rule Sparks Gun Registry Debate

Compact vs Full-Size Suppressors: Which Is Better?

SIG ZULU6 HDX 16×42 Review

Bear Creek Arsenal BC-15 Pistol in .338 ARC

Olight’s Updated ArkPro Ultra EDC Flashlight

ATF Director Addresses Brace Rule and Reform

Why Flintlock Muskets Aren’t Regulated Like AR-15s

Minneapolis Gun Ordinance Likely Violates State Law

Virginia Assault Weapon Ban Faces Federal Lawsuit

Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

From the Archives: Ethan Becker on Independence Day

Jul 4, 2026 1:21 pm

Staccato 2011 Introduces the All-New Staccato HD P4X

Jul 4, 2026 12:15 pm

M8 Howitzer Motor Carriage: Artillery on a Stuart Chassis

Jul 4, 2026 11:22 am

Party Like It’s 1776

Jul 4, 2026 6:08 am

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest tactical, firearms and many more news and updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

Silent Professionals Set the Conditions for Red Flag Success

By Jack Bogart

Freedom Atlantic Introduces FPV Training Drones

By Jack Bogart

SOFWERX – Warfighter Radio Industry Day

By Jack Bogart
Tactical Americans
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Copyright © 2026 Tactical Americans. Created by Sawah Solutions.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.